This week’s content continues the discussion about the new aesthetic potential of Internet-distributed television, with a special focus on gender identity. But I think gender identity is only one of the special manifestations, and the overall criticism in the article is large-scale, including gender, transgender, race, culture and so on. 

In the article, the Trans TV project discusses the transformation of television as a medium and its role as a meeting point between different ways of viewing. This is a good integration of the similarities and differences between different categories, especially the influence and change of gender issues in political and technological development, it can quickly show the problems and convey the ideas. In addition to aesthetic changes, people can also notice the transformation of the media itself, and can realize that in addition to the transformation of the form of expression, the way we look at the problem can also change. In the article, for example, the editors reflect on the status of white men and how they are providing space for the gay, lesbian and transgender community but still not speaking out for them. 

In addition to these, people also discussed the plot of the TV series presented by the TV series, for example, the male protagonist in the plot was fired for allegedly abusing the transgender colleague, this incident can let more people know the difficult life of the transgender people and remind people to have a normal attitude towards them in life. It has also popularized programs in this area to provide a safer and fairer environment for transgender people. 

It also discusses the ethics of satire in contemporary American television comedy, with a particular focus on the genre and phenomenon of using Internet video to reshape culture. The author discusses two series, which reflect and reflect the ideas conveyed by video culture, expose the values and politics of video culture, and allow more viewers to think and reflect with the purpose of satire.

Long Ke